<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 211 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235053</link>
    <description>The Central Government upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in favor of the respondent, allowing the rebate claim for duty paid on inputs used in manufacturing export goods. Despite procedural lapses, the Government found the lapses to be minor and condonable, especially as subsequent exports rectified the issues. The Central Government rejected the revision application by the applicant department, citing the eventual compliance with the required approvals and no dispute regarding the export of goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 10:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 211 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235053</link>
      <description>The Central Government upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in favor of the respondent, allowing the rebate claim for duty paid on inputs used in manufacturing export goods. Despite procedural lapses, the Government found the lapses to be minor and condonable, especially as subsequent exports rectified the issues. The Central Government rejected the revision application by the applicant department, citing the eventual compliance with the required approvals and no dispute regarding the export of goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>