<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 203 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235045</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Incometax [Appeals] and the Tribunal to delete the penalty imposed on bad debts and prior expenses additions. The Court found no evidence of inaccurate particulars or concealment by the assessee, concluding that the penalty was unjustified. As there was no legal or substantial question of law arising, the Tax Appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 203 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235045</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Incometax [Appeals] and the Tribunal to delete the penalty imposed on bad debts and prior expenses additions. The Court found no evidence of inaccurate particulars or concealment by the assessee, concluding that the penalty was unjustified. As there was no legal or substantial question of law arising, the Tax Appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>