<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 202 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235044</link>
    <description>The High Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a tax case, ruling that the assessee failed to adequately prove the source of investment and discrepancies existed in the son-in-law&#039;s transactions. The Court found insufficient evidence supporting the claimed source of funds, leading to the allowance of the Tax Case Appeal and confirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s order while disallowing the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 202 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235044</link>
      <description>The High Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a tax case, ruling that the assessee failed to adequately prove the source of investment and discrepancies existed in the son-in-law&#039;s transactions. The Court found insufficient evidence supporting the claimed source of funds, leading to the allowance of the Tax Case Appeal and confirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s order while disallowing the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>