<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 194 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235036</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order. It held that the premium paid on redemption of premium notes was allowable and could not be disallowed under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2004-05. The decision was based on the precedent established by a previous case where the High Court affirmed a similar ruling, emphasizing the binding nature of such decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 08:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 194 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235036</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order. It held that the premium paid on redemption of premium notes was allowable and could not be disallowed under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2004-05. The decision was based on the precedent established by a previous case where the High Court affirmed a similar ruling, emphasizing the binding nature of such decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>