<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 163 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235005</link>
    <description>The appeal by the Revenue challenging the eligibility of service charges for deduction under section 80IB was dismissed. The court clarified that while sales of software were eligible for deduction as they were derived from the industrial undertaking, service charges were to be excluded from the profit calculation. The court aligned with legal precedents, distinguishing between software sales and service charges, and upheld the treatment of software development expenses as revenue expenditure. The decision followed the principles established by the Apex Court and ultimately affirmed the Order of the CIT (A) in its entirety.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 08:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 163 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235005</link>
      <description>The appeal by the Revenue challenging the eligibility of service charges for deduction under section 80IB was dismissed. The court clarified that while sales of software were eligible for deduction as they were derived from the industrial undertaking, service charges were to be excluded from the profit calculation. The court aligned with legal precedents, distinguishing between software sales and service charges, and upheld the treatment of software development expenses as revenue expenditure. The decision followed the principles established by the Apex Court and ultimately affirmed the Order of the CIT (A) in its entirety.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=235005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>