<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 149 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234991</link>
    <description>The Tribunal imposed a cost of Rs.5000 on the appellant for repeatedly failing to comply with the stay order and missing scheduled hearings. The appellant claimed non-receipt of hearing notices, citing a change in address, but the Tribunal deemed it a delaying tactic. The appellant was directed to pay the cost within fifteen days to the Commissioner of Central Excise for the modification application to be considered. The judgment emphasizes the importance of timely compliance with court directives and the consequences of non-appearance or delay tactics in legal proceedings, aiming to uphold accountability and procedural integrity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2013 07:58:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 149 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234991</link>
      <description>The Tribunal imposed a cost of Rs.5000 on the appellant for repeatedly failing to comply with the stay order and missing scheduled hearings. The appellant claimed non-receipt of hearing notices, citing a change in address, but the Tribunal deemed it a delaying tactic. The appellant was directed to pay the cost within fifteen days to the Commissioner of Central Excise for the modification application to be considered. The judgment emphasizes the importance of timely compliance with court directives and the consequences of non-appearance or delay tactics in legal proceedings, aiming to uphold accountability and procedural integrity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>