<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 144 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234986</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras allowed the Tax Case Appeal, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision on both issues of disallowance of provision for warranty and addition of write back of the provision. The Court emphasized the nature of the provision, the scientific estimation involved, and the distinction between warranty and liquidated damages, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee based on the provided evidence and legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 14:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 144 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234986</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras allowed the Tax Case Appeal, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision on both issues of disallowance of provision for warranty and addition of write back of the provision. The Court emphasized the nature of the provision, the scientific estimation involved, and the distinction between warranty and liquidated damages, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee based on the provided evidence and legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>