https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234971 Interim stay on duty recovery lapsed when the appeal was not decided within the statutory period under the governing pre-deposit scheme, so continued protection could not be demanded as of right. The assessee's withdrawal of the earlier writ petition challenging the pre-deposit direction was treated as acquiescence in the deposit requirement, reinforcing the Tribunal's view that pre-deposit remained payable. On those facts, no error was found in the Tribunal's discretion in refusing extension of stay and directing pre-deposit. en-us Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Apr 2014 11:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234971 Interim stay on duty recovery lapsed when the appeal was not decided within the statutory period under the governing pre-deposit scheme, so continued protection could not be demanded as of right. The assessee's withdrawal of the earlier writ petition challenging the pre-deposit direction was treated as acquiescence in the deposit requirement, reinforcing the Tribunal's view that pre-deposit remained payable. On those facts, no error was found in the Tribunal's discretion in refusing extension of stay and directing pre-deposit. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234971