https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234963 The court dismissed the writ petitions, upholding the legislative competency of the Parliament to amend the SEZ Act. It found that the amendments did not violate Article 14 of the Constitution, were not contrary to the Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel, and did not infringe on the principles of Legitimate Expectancy. The court emphasized the importance of flexibility in fiscal legislation and granting the state broad discretion in economic and social policy matters. en-us Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Nov 2013 17:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234963 The court dismissed the writ petitions, upholding the legislative competency of the Parliament to amend the SEZ Act. It found that the amendments did not violate Article 14 of the Constitution, were not contrary to the Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel, and did not infringe on the principles of Legitimate Expectancy. The court emphasized the importance of flexibility in fiscal legislation and granting the state broad discretion in economic and social policy matters. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234963