<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 117 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234959</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the amounts received from related entities were not taxable as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. The Court held that the amounts constituted business transactions, not loans, as per the Act&#039;s definition. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, clarifying the application of section 2(22)(e) and emphasizing the distinction between business transactions and loans.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 08:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 117 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234959</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the amounts received from related entities were not taxable as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. The Court held that the amounts constituted business transactions, not loans, as per the Act&#039;s definition. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, clarifying the application of section 2(22)(e) and emphasizing the distinction between business transactions and loans.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>