<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 102 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234944</link>
    <description>The appellate authority&#039;s decision was upheld by the Government, rejecting the department&#039;s revision applications. It was concluded that the transaction value for rebate claims should be based on the place of removal within India&#039;s geographical limits, excluding freight and insurance costs beyond the port of export. The rebate claims were deemed correctly sanctioned, and the department&#039;s request for re-adjudication was denied. The Order-in-Appeal was upheld, and the revision applications were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 09:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 102 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234944</link>
      <description>The appellate authority&#039;s decision was upheld by the Government, rejecting the department&#039;s revision applications. It was concluded that the transaction value for rebate claims should be based on the place of removal within India&#039;s geographical limits, excluding freight and insurance costs beyond the port of export. The rebate claims were deemed correctly sanctioned, and the department&#039;s request for re-adjudication was denied. The Order-in-Appeal was upheld, and the revision applications were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>