https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234939 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, determining that the appellant's services qualified as outdoor catering services subject to service tax liability. The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's plea for a stay based on financial hardship, noting that the claimed losses were covered by subsidies from the company. The Tribunal directed the appellant to make a pre-deposit of 50% of the service tax demand within eight weeks, with the balance amount waived upon compliance, and recovery stayed during the appeal's pendency. en-us Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Sep 2015 12:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234939 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, determining that the appellant's services qualified as outdoor catering services subject to service tax liability. The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's plea for a stay based on financial hardship, noting that the claimed losses were covered by subsidies from the company. The Tribunal directed the appellant to make a pre-deposit of 50% of the service tax demand within eight weeks, with the balance amount waived upon compliance, and recovery stayed during the appeal's pendency. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234939