<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 79 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234921</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the appeal filed by the Revenue not maintainable due to the review order being issued after the prescribed limitation period under Section 129D(3) of the Customs Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory timelines and upheld the invalidity of orders issued beyond the specified period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 06:23:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 79 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234921</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the appeal filed by the Revenue not maintainable due to the review order being issued after the prescribed limitation period under Section 129D(3) of the Customs Act. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory timelines and upheld the invalidity of orders issued beyond the specified period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>