<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 71 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234913</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal granting centralized registration to the respondent, M/s Maharashtra State Bureau of Text Books Production &amp;amp; Curriculum Research, Pune. It ruled that the rejection letter of the centralized registration request was appealable, citing Bhagwati Gases Ltd. The Tribunal affirmed the respondent&#039;s eligibility for centralized registration as a service receiver under the Service Tax Rules, 1994, emphasizing the purpose of registration in tax laws. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed for lacking merit, confirming the respondent&#039;s right to centralized registration based on meeting specified conditions and maintaining centralized accounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 71 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234913</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal granting centralized registration to the respondent, M/s Maharashtra State Bureau of Text Books Production &amp;amp; Curriculum Research, Pune. It ruled that the rejection letter of the centralized registration request was appealable, citing Bhagwati Gases Ltd. The Tribunal affirmed the respondent&#039;s eligibility for centralized registration as a service receiver under the Service Tax Rules, 1994, emphasizing the purpose of registration in tax laws. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed for lacking merit, confirming the respondent&#039;s right to centralized registration based on meeting specified conditions and maintaining centralized accounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>