<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 69 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234911</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order in appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that no service tax is payable by the respondent for services received before 18.4.2006, as per the judgment of the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Bombay. The Tribunal found that the recipient in India is not obligated to pay service tax for services provided by foreign companies abroad before the enactment of Section 66A in the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 69 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234911</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order in appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that no service tax is payable by the respondent for services received before 18.4.2006, as per the judgment of the Hon&#039;ble High Court of Bombay. The Tribunal found that the recipient in India is not obligated to pay service tax for services provided by foreign companies abroad before the enactment of Section 66A in the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>