<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 48 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234890</link>
    <description>The Court recalled the order sanctioning a scheme of amalgamation involving mining companies, considering concerns about mining license transfers and compliance issues. Despite objections citing the Companies Act, the Court emphasized its power to supervise scheme implementation and modified the order. The State Trading Corporation of India&#039;s request for a stay was denied, ensuring the applicant&#039;s rights and the transferor companies&#039; independence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 17:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 48 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234890</link>
      <description>The Court recalled the order sanctioning a scheme of amalgamation involving mining companies, considering concerns about mining license transfers and compliance issues. Despite objections citing the Companies Act, the Court emphasized its power to supervise scheme implementation and modified the order. The State Trading Corporation of India&#039;s request for a stay was denied, ensuring the applicant&#039;s rights and the transferor companies&#039; independence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>