https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234871 The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal, emphasizing the authority of Customs officials to levy redemption fines even after the release of goods on bond. The Tribunal found that the goods, even if not available for confiscation, could still be liable for confiscation, setting aside the Commissioner's decision to not impose a redemption fine. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner for a fresh decision in line with the Apex Court's judgment, highlighting the importance of adhering to legal provisions and court precedents in cases of duty demand, penalty imposition, and confiscation of goods. en-us Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jul 2013 09:53:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234871 The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal, emphasizing the authority of Customs officials to levy redemption fines even after the release of goods on bond. The Tribunal found that the goods, even if not available for confiscation, could still be liable for confiscation, setting aside the Commissioner's decision to not impose a redemption fine. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner for a fresh decision in line with the Apex Court's judgment, highlighting the importance of adhering to legal provisions and court precedents in cases of duty demand, penalty imposition, and confiscation of goods. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 18 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234871