<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 27 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234869</link>
    <description>In amalgamation proceedings, the Company Court may examine the bona fides and underlying purpose of a proposed scheme and is not bound to act as a mere rubber stamp. Where surrounding materials create doubt about the company&#039;s affairs, it may require an investigation before the scheme proceeds. However, the Court cannot itself mandate a particular investigating agency; it may only make the appropriate declaration and leave the choice of agency to the Central Government. On the facts, the materials suggesting limited financial substance and share-premium transactions justified refusal to permit the proposed scheme or convene shareholder meetings at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 27 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234869</link>
      <description>In amalgamation proceedings, the Company Court may examine the bona fides and underlying purpose of a proposed scheme and is not bound to act as a mere rubber stamp. Where surrounding materials create doubt about the company&#039;s affairs, it may require an investigation before the scheme proceeds. However, the Court cannot itself mandate a particular investigating agency; it may only make the appropriate declaration and leave the choice of agency to the Central Government. On the facts, the materials suggesting limited financial substance and share-premium transactions justified refusal to permit the proposed scheme or convene shareholder meetings at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>