<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 21 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234863</link>
    <description>A show cause notice under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 was treated as unsustainable against recipients of goods transport operator services who were brought within the return-filing regime under Section 71A of the Finance Act, 2003. The Tribunal&#039;s view, based on earlier authority and later reaffirmation by the Supreme Court, was that persons covered by Section 71A did not fall within the general return-filing and recovery framework under Sections 70 and 73. The retrospective validation plea did not change the result because no proceedings had been initiated before the notice in a way that made the validation provisions ative.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 21 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234863</link>
      <description>A show cause notice under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 was treated as unsustainable against recipients of goods transport operator services who were brought within the return-filing regime under Section 71A of the Finance Act, 2003. The Tribunal&#039;s view, based on earlier authority and later reaffirmation by the Supreme Court, was that persons covered by Section 71A did not fall within the general return-filing and recovery framework under Sections 70 and 73. The retrospective validation plea did not change the result because no proceedings had been initiated before the notice in a way that made the validation provisions ative.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>