<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234843</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) erred in applying section 194C to the transmission charges and directed the AO to reexamine the issue, considering the nature of the contract and the applicability of the Gujarat High Court decision and CBDT Circular No. 9/2012. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, and the stay petitions were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 13:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234843</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) erred in applying section 194C to the transmission charges and directed the AO to reexamine the issue, considering the nature of the contract and the applicability of the Gujarat High Court decision and CBDT Circular No. 9/2012. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, and the stay petitions were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>