<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 666 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234841</link>
    <description>The tribunal found discrepancies in the Assessing Officer&#039;s approach, including reliance on a retracted statement without corroborative evidence and errors in estimating unaccounted sales. Consequently, the tribunal deleted the additions made by the AO and partly allowed the appeal of the assessee. The order was pronounced on 14th June 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 09:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 666 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234841</link>
      <description>The tribunal found discrepancies in the Assessing Officer&#039;s approach, including reliance on a retracted statement without corroborative evidence and errors in estimating unaccounted sales. Consequently, the tribunal deleted the additions made by the AO and partly allowed the appeal of the assessee. The order was pronounced on 14th June 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>