<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 652 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234827</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the dismissal of appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) due to non-compliance with the mandatory pre-deposit condition under Section 35F. Despite the appellants citing financial difficulties, the Court emphasized the importance of the pre-deposit requirement and upheld CESTAT&#039;s decision, stating that revisiting the issue would be akin to reviewing previous orders. The Court found no substantial legal questions to warrant intervention, resulting in the dismissal of both appeals without costs and closure of related pending petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 652 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234827</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the dismissal of appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) due to non-compliance with the mandatory pre-deposit condition under Section 35F. Despite the appellants citing financial difficulties, the Court emphasized the importance of the pre-deposit requirement and upheld CESTAT&#039;s decision, stating that revisiting the issue would be akin to reviewing previous orders. The Court found no substantial legal questions to warrant intervention, resulting in the dismissal of both appeals without costs and closure of related pending petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>