<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 647 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234822</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter for re-examination on merits and unjust enrichment, emphasizing the need for a thorough assessment of unjust enrichment. The Revenue&#039;s appeal did not challenge the finding on unjust enrichment, leading to the dismissal of their appeal and allowing reconsideration of merits. The judgment highlights the importance of addressing all relevant issues, including unjust enrichment, in legal proceedings to ensure a fair decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 09:27:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 647 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234822</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter for re-examination on merits and unjust enrichment, emphasizing the need for a thorough assessment of unjust enrichment. The Revenue&#039;s appeal did not challenge the finding on unjust enrichment, leading to the dismissal of their appeal and allowing reconsideration of merits. The judgment highlights the importance of addressing all relevant issues, including unjust enrichment, in legal proceedings to ensure a fair decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>