<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 642 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234817</link>
    <description>For export goods sold on FOB basis, transportation and allied services used up to the port of loading are treated as input services because the place of removal extends to that port. On that footing, cenvat credit of service tax paid on GTA outward services for moving export consignments from the factory to the port was held admissible. The analysis followed the Board&#039;s circular on credit for transportation up to the place of sale and prior Tribunal rulings recognising export-related transport and connected services up to the port as eligible for credit. The Revenue&#039;s objection on inadmissibility therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 17:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 642 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234817</link>
      <description>For export goods sold on FOB basis, transportation and allied services used up to the port of loading are treated as input services because the place of removal extends to that port. On that footing, cenvat credit of service tax paid on GTA outward services for moving export consignments from the factory to the port was held admissible. The analysis followed the Board&#039;s circular on credit for transportation up to the place of sale and prior Tribunal rulings recognising export-related transport and connected services up to the port as eligible for credit. The Revenue&#039;s objection on inadmissibility therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>