<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 641 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234816</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under Rule 7C of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, due to the appellants&#039; non-provision of services during the relevant period and the discretionary power of the assessing officer to waive late fees for &#039;nil&#039; returns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2014 15:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 641 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234816</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under Rule 7C of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, due to the appellants&#039; non-provision of services during the relevant period and the discretionary power of the assessing officer to waive late fees for &#039;nil&#039; returns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>