https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234811 The Court quashed the orders by the Dy. Commissioner and Assistant Commissioner of Customs demanding a substantial amount from a carpet company for provisional release of goods without proper assessment. Criticizing the lack of quantification of liability before demanding the deposit, the Court emphasized the need for lawful procedures and directed a reconsideration within a month. The judgment highlighted the authorities' failure to assess liability correctly and stressed compliance with legal procedures, leading to the quashing of the impugned orders and a direction for a lawful decision. en-us Thu, 10 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Jun 2013 05:31:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234811 The Court quashed the orders by the Dy. Commissioner and Assistant Commissioner of Customs demanding a substantial amount from a carpet company for provisional release of goods without proper assessment. Criticizing the lack of quantification of liability before demanding the deposit, the Court emphasized the need for lawful procedures and directed a reconsideration within a month. The judgment highlighted the authorities' failure to assess liability correctly and stressed compliance with legal procedures, leading to the quashing of the impugned orders and a direction for a lawful decision. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 10 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234811