<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 634 - CESTAT  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234809</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on duty paid on welding electrodes was treated as admissible on the basis of earlier Tribunal and High Court rulings relied upon in the reasoning. Applying that settled position, the Tribunal held that welding electrodes used by the assessee qualified for Cenvat credit, and the contrary view in the impugned order could not stand. The assessee was therefore entitled to avail the credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 634 - CESTAT  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234809</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on duty paid on welding electrodes was treated as admissible on the basis of earlier Tribunal and High Court rulings relied upon in the reasoning. Applying that settled position, the Tribunal held that welding electrodes used by the assessee qualified for Cenvat credit, and the contrary view in the impugned order could not stand. The assessee was therefore entitled to avail the credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>