<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 628 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234803</link>
    <description>The ITAT Hyderabad quashed the reassessment initiated by the Assessing Officer after four years, emphasizing the absence of new material indicating income escapement and considering it a change of opinion. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of full disclosure of material facts by the assessee during the original assessment, citing relevant legal precedents to support its decision. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, and the reassessment was deemed invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 05:30:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 628 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234803</link>
      <description>The ITAT Hyderabad quashed the reassessment initiated by the Assessing Officer after four years, emphasizing the absence of new material indicating income escapement and considering it a change of opinion. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of full disclosure of material facts by the assessee during the original assessment, citing relevant legal precedents to support its decision. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, and the reassessment was deemed invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>