<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 614 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234789</link>
    <description>A Rajasthan HC ruling on Circular No. 967/01/2013-CX limited recovery action where assessees had filed appeals with stay applications and the applications remained pending for reasons not attributable to them. The Court applied its earlier binding view that the circular was non est to that extent, and that coercive recovery should not be initiated before disposal of the stay request. It also indicated that the appellate and interim applications should be heard expeditiously. The challenge therefore succeeded insofar as the circular authorised recovery in such pending-stay cases, and enforcement against those assessees was barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:43:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 614 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234789</link>
      <description>A Rajasthan HC ruling on Circular No. 967/01/2013-CX limited recovery action where assessees had filed appeals with stay applications and the applications remained pending for reasons not attributable to them. The Court applied its earlier binding view that the circular was non est to that extent, and that coercive recovery should not be initiated before disposal of the stay request. It also indicated that the appellate and interim applications should be heard expeditiously. The challenge therefore succeeded insofar as the circular authorised recovery in such pending-stay cases, and enforcement against those assessees was barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>