<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 610 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234785</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, finding that denial of Cenvat credit was unjustified as the appellants had paid more duty than the credit availed. The rejection of refund claims was deemed improper as the activities were compliant with the Cenvat Credit Rules. The duty paid by the appellants was considered appropriate, and their actions were in line with Circulars and judicial pronouncements. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with the rules and granted consequential relief to the appellants, with the decision pronounced on 23-6-2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 17:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 610 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234785</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, finding that denial of Cenvat credit was unjustified as the appellants had paid more duty than the credit availed. The rejection of refund claims was deemed improper as the activities were compliant with the Cenvat Credit Rules. The duty paid by the appellants was considered appropriate, and their actions were in line with Circulars and judicial pronouncements. The Tribunal emphasized compliance with the rules and granted consequential relief to the appellants, with the decision pronounced on 23-6-2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>