<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 608 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234783</link>
    <description>Relief against forfeiture under Section 114 of the Transfer of Property Act is available only if the tenant pays or tenders the arrears, interest and costs at the first hearing. Where arrears of rent and the tenancy terms are admitted, and the tenant fails to make the required payment even after earlier , the protection is unavailable. A lease clause providing forfeiture for two consecutive defaults and notice by registered post supports enforcement of the landlord&#039;s right; service of summons may also constitute a sufficient demand. In this setting, the tenant&#039;s defence to possession does not survive and a decree on admission under Order XII Rule 6 of the CPC is justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:13:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 608 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234783</link>
      <description>Relief against forfeiture under Section 114 of the Transfer of Property Act is available only if the tenant pays or tenders the arrears, interest and costs at the first hearing. Where arrears of rent and the tenancy terms are admitted, and the tenant fails to make the required payment even after earlier , the protection is unavailable. A lease clause providing forfeiture for two consecutive defaults and notice by registered post supports enforcement of the landlord&#039;s right; service of summons may also constitute a sufficient demand. In this setting, the tenant&#039;s defence to possession does not survive and a decree on admission under Order XII Rule 6 of the CPC is justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>