<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 597 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234772</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed that TDS was not required on leaseline and transaction charges paid by the stock broking company. The decision aligned with precedents and previous findings, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment emphasized the distinction between technical services and infrastructure use, clarifying the TDS obligations in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 09:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 597 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234772</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed that TDS was not required on leaseline and transaction charges paid by the stock broking company. The decision aligned with precedents and previous findings, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment emphasized the distinction between technical services and infrastructure use, clarifying the TDS obligations in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>