<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 595 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234770</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the department was dismissed, and the CIT (A)&#039;s order deleting the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was confirmed. The ITAT emphasized the need for concrete evidence of concealment or inaccuracy in penalty proceedings, independent of the findings in assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 17:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 595 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234770</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the department was dismissed, and the CIT (A)&#039;s order deleting the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was confirmed. The ITAT emphasized the need for concrete evidence of concealment or inaccuracy in penalty proceedings, independent of the findings in assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>