<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 594 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234769</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all three appeals filed by the department, confirming the deletions made by the CIT (A) on account of gross profit discrepancy, excess stock, and unexplained bank deposits. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper accounting treatment, the necessity of rejecting books of accounts before making additions, and the requirement for concrete evidence to support claims of unexplained income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:12:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 594 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234769</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all three appeals filed by the department, confirming the deletions made by the CIT (A) on account of gross profit discrepancy, excess stock, and unexplained bank deposits. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper accounting treatment, the necessity of rejecting books of accounts before making additions, and the requirement for concrete evidence to support claims of unexplained income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>