<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 591 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234766</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the Transfer Pricing Officer to re-evaluate the Advertisement, Marketing, and Sales Promotion (AMP) expenses and the Assessing Officer to verify the Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) payment for the corporate tax issue. The Tribunal upheld the royalty payment as justified and necessary for the business, rejecting the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s conclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 591 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234766</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the Transfer Pricing Officer to re-evaluate the Advertisement, Marketing, and Sales Promotion (AMP) expenses and the Assessing Officer to verify the Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) payment for the corporate tax issue. The Tribunal upheld the royalty payment as justified and necessary for the business, rejecting the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s conclusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>