https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234758 An appellate order setting aside a dropped excise adjudication was not interfered with because no authority had determined duty liability, quantified any excise demand, or found that the damaged aluminium tubes were manufactured or marketable as excisable goods. The mere reversal of the primary order did not, by itself, fasten duty, interest, or penalty on the assessee, and no civil consequence or prejudice was shown to arise from that appellate order. In the absence of any established fiscal liability, the challenge failed and the appeal was dismissed. en-us Thu, 16 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Jun 2013 09:37:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234758 An appellate order setting aside a dropped excise adjudication was not interfered with because no authority had determined duty liability, quantified any excise demand, or found that the damaged aluminium tubes were manufactured or marketable as excisable goods. The mere reversal of the primary order did not, by itself, fasten duty, interest, or penalty on the assessee, and no civil consequence or prejudice was shown to arise from that appellate order. In the absence of any established fiscal liability, the challenge failed and the appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 16 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234758