<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 567 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234742</link>
    <description>Frequent and voluminous share and unit transactions were assessed as capital gains because the assessee consistently treated them as investment activity, the facts were unchanged from the earlier year, and no contrary material showed dealer status. The Tribunal followed its own prior decision in the assessee&#039;s case, found no distinguishing feature or reason to depart from that view, and held that the resulting profit remained capital in nature rather than business income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 09:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 567 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234742</link>
      <description>Frequent and voluminous share and unit transactions were assessed as capital gains because the assessee consistently treated them as investment activity, the facts were unchanged from the earlier year, and no contrary material showed dealer status. The Tribunal followed its own prior decision in the assessee&#039;s case, found no distinguishing feature or reason to depart from that view, and held that the resulting profit remained capital in nature rather than business income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>