<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 566 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234741</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the disallowances and enhancements made by the AO and CIT(A) were not justified. It concluded that the contractor could not have executed the work without incurring the claimed expenses. The Tribunal directed the AO to re-compute the income using a reasonable net profit rate. The appeal was partly allowed on 18th June 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:06:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 566 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234741</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the disallowances and enhancements made by the AO and CIT(A) were not justified. It concluded that the contractor could not have executed the work without incurring the claimed expenses. The Tribunal directed the AO to re-compute the income using a reasonable net profit rate. The appeal was partly allowed on 18th June 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>