https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234738 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellant, a recipient of GTA service, in a case challenging a service tax demand for a specific period. The Tribunal held that the show-cause notice issued after a retrospective amendment was not legally sustainable, following the precedent set by a previous case. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of issuing show-cause notices within the relevant period for compliance with retrospective legislative changes. en-us Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Jun 2013 22:19:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234738 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellant, a recipient of GTA service, in a case challenging a service tax demand for a specific period. The Tribunal held that the show-cause notice issued after a retrospective amendment was not legally sustainable, following the precedent set by a previous case. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of issuing show-cause notices within the relevant period for compliance with retrospective legislative changes. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234738