<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 556 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234731</link>
    <description>The Court remitted the case to the Settlement Commission for reconsideration on two issues: allowing DFRC license utilization for paying the balance duty liability and modifying the excessive fine in lieu of confiscation. The Commission was directed to pass a fresh order after proper consideration of relevant facts and circumstances, without disturbing the rest of the original order. No costs were awarded, and the petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:22:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 556 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234731</link>
      <description>The Court remitted the case to the Settlement Commission for reconsideration on two issues: allowing DFRC license utilization for paying the balance duty liability and modifying the excessive fine in lieu of confiscation. The Commission was directed to pass a fresh order after proper consideration of relevant facts and circumstances, without disturbing the rest of the original order. No costs were awarded, and the petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>