<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 541 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234716</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant did not establish a prima facie case for a complete waiver of the confirmed Service Tax liability, interest, and penalties. It determined that the appellant retained possession and ownership of the Diesel Generator sets, despite some control by service recipients. The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit a specified amount within a set period, allowing a waiver of pre-deposit of the balance amount pending appeal disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 18:45:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 541 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234716</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the appellant did not establish a prima facie case for a complete waiver of the confirmed Service Tax liability, interest, and penalties. It determined that the appellant retained possession and ownership of the Diesel Generator sets, despite some control by service recipients. The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit a specified amount within a set period, allowing a waiver of pre-deposit of the balance amount pending appeal disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>