<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 537 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234712</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed due to defective authorization by the committee of Chief Commissioners, as it lacked proper application of mind. The application for condonation of delay was also dismissed. The tribunal stressed the significance of meaningful consideration and independent application of mind by the committee, as outlined in the Board&#039;s memorandum of instructions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 537 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234712</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed due to defective authorization by the committee of Chief Commissioners, as it lacked proper application of mind. The application for condonation of delay was also dismissed. The tribunal stressed the significance of meaningful consideration and independent application of mind by the committee, as outlined in the Board&#039;s memorandum of instructions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>