<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 519 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234694</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting the deduction under section 10(10C) of the Income Tax Act for ex-gratia payments received under the VRS Scheme of State Bank of India. However, the claim for deduction under section 10(5) of the Act for leave travel concession was dismissed due to overseas travel being included, restricting the taxable amount to Rs. 1,19,227.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 08:32:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 519 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234694</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting the deduction under section 10(10C) of the Income Tax Act for ex-gratia payments received under the VRS Scheme of State Bank of India. However, the claim for deduction under section 10(5) of the Act for leave travel concession was dismissed due to overseas travel being included, restricting the taxable amount to Rs. 1,19,227.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>