<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 467 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234642</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit was admissible on service tax paid for fumigation of export containers at factory premises because the activity formed part of packing for exported finished goods. The service was treated as integrally connected with packing expenses, which qualify for credit as input services. On that basis, the fumigation service fell within the scope of input service for CENVAT credit purposes, and credit had to be allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 16:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 467 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234642</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit was admissible on service tax paid for fumigation of export containers at factory premises because the activity formed part of packing for exported finished goods. The service was treated as integrally connected with packing expenses, which qualify for credit as input services. On that basis, the fumigation service fell within the scope of input service for CENVAT credit purposes, and credit had to be allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>