<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 454 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234629</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court granted leave to a firm to clear a consignment of Betelnuts at an enhanced rate as per an Assessment Order, despite a pre-existing contract with lower pricing. The Court safeguarded the firm&#039;s rights in the appeal before CESTAT, indicating potential refund of any excess amount paid. The judgment highlighted the importance of the pending appeal in determining refund eligibility, emphasizing fair treatment and protection of legal rights for all parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 17:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 454 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234629</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court granted leave to a firm to clear a consignment of Betelnuts at an enhanced rate as per an Assessment Order, despite a pre-existing contract with lower pricing. The Court safeguarded the firm&#039;s rights in the appeal before CESTAT, indicating potential refund of any excess amount paid. The judgment highlighted the importance of the pending appeal in determining refund eligibility, emphasizing fair treatment and protection of legal rights for all parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>