<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 449 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234624</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the Appellants, setting aside the orders of the lower authorities. The decision was based on the interpretation of the Central Excise Act and relevant legal provisions, emphasizing that charges for transportation should not be included in the assessable value if separately shown and billed, as per established legal principles and past judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:23:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 449 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234624</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the Appellants, setting aside the orders of the lower authorities. The decision was based on the interpretation of the Central Excise Act and relevant legal provisions, emphasizing that charges for transportation should not be included in the assessable value if separately shown and billed, as per established legal principles and past judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>