<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 440 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234615</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the admissibility of CENVAT Credit on Clearing &amp;amp; Forwarding charges for export, considering the place of removal as the port or airport, in line with established judicial precedents. The appeal against the disallowance of CENVAT Credit was rejected, affirming the legality of the impugned order and confirming the correctness of allowing the credit for services provided by Clearing &amp;amp; Forwarding Agents for export clearance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:00:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 440 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234615</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the admissibility of CENVAT Credit on Clearing &amp;amp; Forwarding charges for export, considering the place of removal as the port or airport, in line with established judicial precedents. The appeal against the disallowance of CENVAT Credit was rejected, affirming the legality of the impugned order and confirming the correctness of allowing the credit for services provided by Clearing &amp;amp; Forwarding Agents for export clearance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>