<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 428 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234603</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that section 50C of the Income Tax Act did not apply to the transfer of lease hold property. It was established that the valuation of the property was correctly determined by the Ld.CIT(A), and there was no undervaluation in the transaction. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the order of the lower authority was upheld on June 7, 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 18:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 428 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234603</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that section 50C of the Income Tax Act did not apply to the transfer of lease hold property. It was established that the valuation of the property was correctly determined by the Ld.CIT(A), and there was no undervaluation in the transaction. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the order of the lower authority was upheld on June 7, 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>