<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 416 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234591</link>
    <description>The Tribunal denied the appellant&#039;s request for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for adjudged dues amounting to Rs. 52,82,725 demanded for service tax and education cess. The Tribunal classified the services provided by the appellant as &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039; (BAS) based on the agreement terms, rejecting the appellant&#039;s argument for &#039;Business Support Services&#039; (BSS). The challenge on the ground of limitation was dismissed due to the appellant&#039;s failure to disclose BAS activities. Despite the appellant&#039;s financial hardship claim, the Tribunal ordered a partial pre-deposit of Rs. 20 lakhs within six weeks, granting waiver and stay of recovery for penalties and remaining dues upon compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:53:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 416 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234591</link>
      <description>The Tribunal denied the appellant&#039;s request for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery for adjudged dues amounting to Rs. 52,82,725 demanded for service tax and education cess. The Tribunal classified the services provided by the appellant as &#039;Business Auxiliary Service&#039; (BAS) based on the agreement terms, rejecting the appellant&#039;s argument for &#039;Business Support Services&#039; (BSS). The challenge on the ground of limitation was dismissed due to the appellant&#039;s failure to disclose BAS activities. Despite the appellant&#039;s financial hardship claim, the Tribunal ordered a partial pre-deposit of Rs. 20 lakhs within six weeks, granting waiver and stay of recovery for penalties and remaining dues upon compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>