https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234569 The Tribunal granted partial relief to the appellant in the case, allowing CENVAT credit for outward transportation of cement up to 31/03/2008 based on a High Court decision. However, post 01/04/2008, the amended definition of 'input service' under Rule 2(1) precluded the appellant from claiming credit for GTA service. The appellant was directed to predeposit Rs.1 crore within six weeks for one appeal, leading to a waiver and stay on penalties and remaining CENVAT credit. In another appeal, the appellant succeeded in obtaining a waiver and stay on duty demand and penalties under Notification No.4/2006-CE (Sl. No.1A) based on a prima facie merit finding by the Tribunal. en-us Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Jun 2013 21:00:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234569 The Tribunal granted partial relief to the appellant in the case, allowing CENVAT credit for outward transportation of cement up to 31/03/2008 based on a High Court decision. However, post 01/04/2008, the amended definition of 'input service' under Rule 2(1) precluded the appellant from claiming credit for GTA service. The appellant was directed to predeposit Rs.1 crore within six weeks for one appeal, leading to a waiver and stay on penalties and remaining CENVAT credit. In another appeal, the appellant succeeded in obtaining a waiver and stay on duty demand and penalties under Notification No.4/2006-CE (Sl. No.1A) based on a prima facie merit finding by the Tribunal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234569